ARC 6Prove Boundaries and DeliverChapters 23โ€“26

Arc 6 Recap โ€” Graduate with Boundaries and Evidence (Chapters 23โ€“26)

DSM provides explicit semantics, recovery paths, and evidence boundaries for suitable shared coordination state. The corresponding systems remain authoritative for business facts.

Four graduation decisions

  1. Protocol: real ports prove reachability; Redis-shaped is not a Redis product and does not change partition semantics.
  2. Scope: federation preserves different contracts for three collections and creates neither a global transaction nor cross-region Lease ownership.
  3. Exclusion: authoritative facts, complete history, strong coordination, and pure cache return to systems fitted to those duties.
  4. Release: evidence level follows the claim and separates current green results from deployment acceptance.

How this arc realizes DSM's value

Real ports, federation, technology exclusion, and the capstone test the limits of DSM's value. The team can name consistency work reused from DSM, business/production responsibilities remaining outside, and the next decision: adopt, reject, or validate further.

Final mapping of the running case

State Final choice External responsibility retained
route hint Register health authority, TTL/cleanup, bad-route handling
shard owner Lease external fencing, uncertainty, partition policy
request counter PN-Counter mergeable observation only, no settlement
order and inventory reject DSM as authority transaction, audit, compensation
cross-region coordination federation selected per collection real relay, security, capacity, recovery

Verifiable learning outcomes

Final sentence

Distributed shared memory does not disguise remote access as local access. DSM gives inevitable divergence explicit collection semantics, recovery processes, and evidence boundaries so business teams can understand it, engineering systems can handle it, and experiments can verify it.